Dont Be Evil  
 Don't Be Evil - restoring the public trust in business, politics and the media   
 
    
« Home

Email Contact

comments at dontbeevil dot com

Posts

Brin - the principled approach makes more sense
Censorship and moral equivalence
Steve Ballmer on Don't Be Evil
Lauren Weinstein on "Don't Be Evil"
Uncensored Google.com serves 99% of China queries
What does Vint Cerf think about censorship?
Did Google Hire Stratfor for Counterprotest Work?
Not just morally repugnant
Don't be hypocritical
What lies in our power not to do
 
     Archives
04/25/04 05/02/04 05/09/04 05/16/04 05/23/04 05/30/04 06/13/04 07/04/04 07/11/04 08/08/04 11/07/04 12/05/04 04/17/05 04/24/05 05/01/05 05/08/05 05/15/05 06/12/05 06/26/05 07/10/05 07/17/05 07/24/05 07/31/05 08/07/05 08/28/05 09/18/05 09/25/05 10/09/05 11/13/05 12/04/05 01/15/06 01/22/06 01/29/06 02/05/06 02/12/06 03/12/06 04/02/06 04/09/06 04/16/06 04/23/06 04/30/06 05/07/06 05/14/06 05/21/06 06/04/06
 
     Links
Poynter Google's Ten Things Conflict of Interest


Google refuses subpoena of innocent searches - 1/18/2006 11:24:00 PM

From the Mercury News, Feds want Google search records.

Looks like a government fishing expedition:

The Bush administration on Wednesday asked a federal judge to order Google Inc. to turn over a broad range of material from its closely guarded databases. The move is part of a government effort to revive an Internet child protection law struck down two years ago by the U.S. Supreme Court. The law was meant to punish online pornography sites that make their content inaccessible to minors....

[The subpoena] includes a request for one million random Web addresses and records of all Google searches from any one-week period.

Google refused:

In court papers filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose, Justice Department lawyers revealed that Google has refused to comply with a subpoena issued last year for the records....saying it would violate the privacy rights of its users and reveal company trade secrets....the company will fight the government's effort ``vigorously.''

``Google is not a party to this lawsuit, and the demand for the information is overreaching,'' [spokesperson Nicole] Wong said.

But other search engines have caved:

The government indicated that other, unspecified search engines have agreed to release the information, but not Google.

It would have been easier and cheaper for Google to quietly hand over the information the government requested, including your innocent searches, search results, and what sites you clicked on. You and I would have been none the wiser.

But that would have been evil.


 dontbeevil.com